Screener
ASEA vs EWS
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
Key differences
Both ASEA and EWS are equity ETFs. ASEA charges 0.65% a year and EWS 0.50%. The main difference: EWS costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWS costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWS is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASEA | EWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $783M |
| Since | 2011 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 15.14% |
| Max drawdown | -44.16% | -40.84% |
Similar to ASEA and EWS
Explore further