Screener
EWS vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWS and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EWS charges 0.50% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EWS costs 0.22% less per year.
- EWS costs 0.22% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than EWS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWS | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $783M | $4.0B |
| Since | 1996 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.14% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -40.84% | -44.52% |
Similar to EWS and AAXJ
Explore further