Screener
ASEA vs EWM
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
Key differences
Both ASEA and EWM are equity ETFs. ASEA charges 0.65% a year and EWM 0.50%. The main difference: ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EWM covers emerging markets.
- ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EWM covers emerging markets.
- EWM costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWM is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASEA | EWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $366M |
| Since | 2011 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 3.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 14.04% |
| Max drawdown | -44.16% | -43.81% |
Similar to ASEA and EWM
Explore further