Screener
ASEA vs GEME
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Key differences
Both ASEA and GEME are equity ETFs. ASEA charges 0.65% a year and GEME 0.75%. The main difference: ASEA follows a index tracking strategy; GEME uses active selection.
- ASEA follows a index tracking strategy; GEME uses active selection.
- ASEA costs 0.10% less per year.
- GEME is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASEA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASEA | GEME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $346M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +66.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 22.26% |
| Max drawdown | -44.16% | -16.86% |
Similar to ASEA and GEME
Explore further