Screener
ASIA vs ADIV
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $55M |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and ADIV
Explore further