Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ASIA vs MCH

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF

ASIA

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

MCH

Matthews China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$22M

Key differences

  • ASIA covers asia pacific markets; MCH covers emerging markets.

Side-by-side comparison

ASIAMCH
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$50M$22M
Since20232022
Dividend yield0.90%1.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+55.9%+24.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+11.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.39
Volatility 1Y20.89%19.91%
Max drawdown-23.95%-40.53%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ASIA and MCH