Screener
ATMP vs MLPA
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- MLPA costs 0.18% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than ATMP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ATMP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ATMP | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $657M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2013 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.9% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +24.3% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.07% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ATMP and MLPA
Explore further