Screener
ATMP vs MLPD
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- MLPD costs 0.35% less per year.
- ATMP is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ATMP follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- ATMP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ATMP | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $657M | $29M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.07% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ATMP and MLPD
Explore further