Screener
MLPA vs AMZA
Global X MLP ETF vs InfraCap MLP ETF
Key differences
- MLPA costs 0.95% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than AMZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPA follows a index tracking strategy; AMZA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AMZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 1.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $464M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 7.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 17.74% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -86.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and AMZA
Explore further