Screener
ATMP vs PIPE
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- PIPE costs 0.20% less per year.
- ATMP is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ATMP covers north america markets; PIPE covers global.
- ATMP follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
- ATMP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ATMP | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $657M | $64M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.07% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ATMP and PIPE
Explore further