Screener
BAFE vs GEM
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- GEM costs 0.19% less per year.
- BAFE follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAFE | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.29% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +50.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.12% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -18.37% | -37.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAFE and GEM
Explore further