Screener
BAIV vs IWM
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.41% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IWM covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IWM
Explore further