Screener
BAIV vs IWN
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV covers global markets; IWN covers north america.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and IWN
Explore further