Screener
BALQ vs MEAR
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.09% less per year.
- MEAR is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BALQ follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BALQ | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -11.79% | -2.68% |
Similar to BALQ and MEAR
Explore further