Screener
MEAR vs CSHP
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.06% less per year.
- MEAR is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEAR covers north america markets; CSHP covers global.
- MEAR follows a active selection strategy; CSHP uses index tracking.
- MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $190M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 0.34% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -0.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEAR and CSHP
Explore further