Screener
BASV vs PSC
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.33% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than BASV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BASV follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BASV | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $359M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.93% |
| Max drawdown | -9.43% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BASV and PSC
Explore further