Screener
BBAX vs EEM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
Both BBAX and EEM are equity ETFs. BBAX charges 0.19% a year and EEM 0.72%. The main difference: BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEM covers emerging markets.
- BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEM covers emerging markets.
- BBAX costs 0.53% less per year.
- EEM is much larger than BBAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBAX | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.4B | $30.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 21.09% |
| Max drawdown | -39.64% | -39.82% |
Similar to BBAX and EEM
Explore further