Screener
BBAX vs EEMA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both BBAX and EEMA are equity ETFs. BBAX charges 0.19% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- BBAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- BBAX is much larger than EEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBAX | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.4B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -39.64% | -44.18% |
Similar to BBAX and EEMA
Explore further