Screener
BBAX vs GEM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both BBAX and GEM are equity ETFs. BBAX charges 0.19% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: BBAX follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- BBAX follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- BBAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; GEM covers emerging markets.
- BBAX costs 0.16% less per year.
- BBAX is much larger than GEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBAX | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.4B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +41.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 20.62% |
| Max drawdown | -39.64% | -37.02% |
Similar to BBAX and GEM
Explore further