Screener
BBH vs MOO
VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.21% less per year.
- MOO is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BBH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | 13.87% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BBH and MOO
Explore further