Screener
MOO vs PPH
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- PPH costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOO | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $966M |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.89% | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOO and PPH
Explore further