Screener
BBJP vs IPAC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both BBJP and IPAC are equity ETFs. BBJP charges 0.19% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- BBJP is much larger than IPAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBJP | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.4B | $2.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.71% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -32.66% | -31.00% |
Similar to BBJP and IPAC
Explore further