Screener
IPAC vs EWJ
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.40% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than IPAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $21.0B |
| Since | 2014 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 19.77% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -33.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and EWJ
Explore further