Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BBLU vs EMXC

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

BBLU

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$436M

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$24.6B

Key differences

Both BBLU and EMXC are equity ETFs. BBLU charges 0.15% a year and EMXC 0.25%. The main difference: BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.

  • BBLU follows a active selection strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
  • BBLU covers North America; EMXC covers emerging markets.
  • BBLU costs 0.10% less per year.
  • EMXC is much larger than BBLU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BBLUEMXC
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$436M$24.6B
Since19972017
Dividend yield1.13%2.04%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.7%+60.7%
CAGR 3Y+23.3%+26.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+11.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.321.17
Volatility 1Y11.42%23.12%
Max drawdown-17.20%-42.81%

Similar to BBLU and EMXC