Screener
BCCC vs QYLD
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QYLD costs 0.15% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCCC | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 11.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.72% |
| Max drawdown | -42.15% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCCC and QYLD
Explore further