Screener
BCCC vs XYLD
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XYLD costs 0.15% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCCC | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 10.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.73% |
| Max drawdown | -42.15% | -33.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCCC and XYLD
Explore further