Screener
BCCC vs QYLG
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- QYLG costs 0.40% less per year.
- QYLG is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCCC | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $142M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.29% |
| Max drawdown | -42.15% | -29.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCCC and QYLG
Explore further