Screener
BCHP vs CGBL
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.25% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than BCHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP is classified as equity, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and CGBL
Explore further