Screener
BCLO vs IGEB
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF vs iShares Investment Grade Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGEB costs 0.27% less per year.
- IGEB is significantly larger than BCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCLO follows a active selection strategy; IGEB uses index tracking.
- IGEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCLO | IGEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 6.76% | 5.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.09% | 4.23% |
| Max drawdown | -4.46% | -21.13% |
Similar to BCLO and IGEB
Explore further