Screener
BCLO vs HYBB
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF vs iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYBB costs 0.20% less per year.
- HYBB is significantly larger than BCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCLO follows a active selection strategy; HYBB uses index tracking.
- HYBB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCLO | HYBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $424M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 6.76% | 6.07% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.09% | 3.32% |
| Max drawdown | -4.46% | -15.27% |
Similar to BCLO and HYBB
Explore further