Screener
BCLO vs LQDB
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF vs iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- LQDB costs 0.30% less per year.
- BCLO follows a active selection strategy; LQDB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCLO | LQDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $52M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.76% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.09% | 4.15% |
| Max drawdown | -4.46% | -21.63% |
Similar to BCLO and LQDB
Explore further