Screener
BDGS vs HYLS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
Key differences
- HYLS costs 0.18% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while HYLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; HYLS uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | HYLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 6.65% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 3.56% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and HYLS
Explore further