Screener
HYLS vs KDRN
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
Key differences
- KDRN costs 0.07% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while KDRN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; KDRN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | KDRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $1M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 3.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 3.64% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -15.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and KDRN
Explore further