Screener
BDGS vs KDRN
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
Key differences
- KDRN costs 0.25% less per year.
- BDGS is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while KDRN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; KDRN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | KDRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $1M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 3.12% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 3.64% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -15.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and KDRN
Explore further