Screener
BDVL vs ACWV
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.20% less per year.
- BDVL is classified as mixed asset, while ACWV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDVL covers north america markets; ACWV covers global.
- BDVL follows a active selection strategy; ACWV uses index tracking.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDVL | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -7.71% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDVL and ACWV
Explore further