Screener
BDVL vs VFMV
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFMV costs 0.27% less per year.
- BDVL is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDVL is classified as mixed asset, while VFMV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDVL follows a active selection strategy; VFMV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDVL | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $421M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.86% |
| Max drawdown | -7.71% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDVL and VFMV
Explore further