Screener
BDVL vs CFA
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF vs VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- CFA costs 0.05% less per year.
- BDVL is significantly larger than CFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDVL is classified as mixed asset, while CFA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDVL follows a active selection strategy; CFA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDVL | CFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $532M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.89% |
| Max drawdown | -7.71% | -37.74% |
Similar to BDVL and CFA
Explore further