Screener
BEDZ vs GK
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.22% less per year.
- GK is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | GK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $29M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 0.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +36.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 17.39% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -47.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and GK
Explore further