Screener
BETZ vs ESPO
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.20% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BETZ | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $257M |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.96% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.7% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.37% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -60.82% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BETZ and ESPO
Explore further