Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BETZ vs GAMR

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF

BETZ

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$51M

GAMR

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF

Amplify ETFs

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$37M

Key differences

  • GAMR costs 0.16% less per year.
  • Over the last 3 years, GAMR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BETZGAMR
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$51M$37M
Since20202016
Dividend yield4.96%0.57%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-7.7%+20.8%
CAGR 3Y+4.4%+14.9%
CAGR 5Y-7.7%+0.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.150.56
Volatility 1Y20.37%22.42%
Max drawdown-60.82%-54.16%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BETZ and GAMR