Screener
BFIX vs XNAV
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
BFIX is a fixed income ETF, while XNAV is an alternative ETF. BFIX charges 0.45% a year and XNAV 1.27%.
- BFIX is a fixed income fund, while XNAV is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- BFIX costs 0.82% less per year.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $34M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.89% | 17.40% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.