Screener
BFLX vs DYNF
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.14% less per year.
- BFLX covers global markets; DYNF covers north america.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $34.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and DYNF
Explore further