Screener
BFLX vs THRO
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.17% less per year.
- BFLX covers global markets; THRO covers north america.
- THRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | THRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $8.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.11% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -26.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and THRO
Explore further