Screener
DYNF vs THRO
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.31% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than THRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYNF | THRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34.0B | $8.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.41 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.60% | 13.11% |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | -26.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DYNF and THRO
Explore further