Screener
BFLX vs IFGL
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.08% less per year.
- BFLX follows a active selection strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $88M |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -0.31% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and IFGL
Explore further