Screener
IFGL vs ENHI
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.21% less per year.
- IFGL is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFGL is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IFGL follows a index tracking strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFGL | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $11M |
| Since | 2007 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.38% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFGL and ENHI
Explore further