Screener
IFGL vs BDYN
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.08% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than IFGL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFGL is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IFGL follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFGL | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.38% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFGL and BDYN
Explore further