Screener
BFLX vs SECT
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.29% less per year.
- BFLX covers global markets; SECT covers north america.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $2.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -38.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and SECT
Explore further