Screener
SECT vs BDYN
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.29% less per year.
- SECT is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BDYN
Explore further