Screener
BFOR vs ROAM
Barron's 400 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.21% less per year.
- BFOR covers north america markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $106M |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and ROAM
Explore further